Painting of the Day

14 Jun

Orange and Black Wall. by Franz Kline (1910-1962). Oil on canvas, 1959. Currently on view at the Museo Thyssen-Bornemisza, Madrid, Spain.

Notes from 1001 Paintings You Must See Before You Die:

Franz Kline described his paintings as “situations,” and believed that good art accurately conveyed the emotions of its creator. His best known works are monumentally scaled abstract canvases that retain a visible residue of the highly physical process behind their creation. Though Kline claimed that these works reference specific places, they do not seem guided by any objective logic. Like the works of fellow action painters Jackson Pollock and Willem de Kooning, Kline’s paintings appear to be a spontaneous, muscular translation of the artist’s will into material form. Kline typically worked in a monochromatic palette of black and white. The addition of bold, thick streaks of color in Orange and Black Wall adds yet another dimension of vitality and dynamism to the finished work. The black lines appear to form an Expressionistic grid, out of which the orange, green, and red spill. Despite the lack of a clear division between figure and ground, the painting never becomes static. It resounds with an array of potential emotive origins and so invites constant speculation as to its meanings. Kline’s dramatic life has only fueled his iconic status–he struggled for years to find success as a portrait and landscape painter, rose rapidly to international prominence in the 1950s when he began painting in pure abstractions, then died of heart failure in 1962, only fifty-one years old and at the height of his fame. As a public figure, he reflects the “celebrity artist” phenomenon that pervaded the mid-twentieth-century American art world.

Additional notes from moma.org:

Kline’s first academic training was at Boston University from 1931 to 1935 and in London at the Heatherley School of Art from 1937 to 1938 as an illustrator and draughtsman. Two main tendencies emerged at an early stage that would later develop into a powerful contribution to the ‘gestural’ trend withinAbstract Expressionism. Numerous small graphics, sketches and oils and the mural series Hot Jazz (Norfolk, VA, Chrysler Mus.), painted for a New York bar in 1940, reveal an interest in translating animated subjects into quick, rudimentary strokes. Kline admired and found inspiration in a wide range of artists notable for their fluency in handling paint, including Rembrandt, Goya, Manet, Sargent and Whistler. By contrast, an inclination to compose in terms of simplified areas was derived from academic training and perhaps also reflected Kline’s memories of his native Pennsylvania’s coal-mining region, with its stark scenery, locomotives and similar massive mechanical shapes to which the titles of his later abstract images sometimes referred. Nijinsky as Petrouchka (1948; Cedarhurst, NY, Mr and Mrs I. David Orr priv. col., see Gaugh, 1985 exh. cat., p. 66) and similar canvases marked the climax of this representational phase with their combination of vigorous brushwork and an angular substructure. But against the context of contemporary New York painting a move towards abstraction was inevitable.

In 1946 Kline began to generalize his subjects into series of lines and planes, which produced the semi-abstract mosaic of broad facets influenced by Cubism found in The Dancer (1946; priv. col., see Gaugh, 1985 exh. cat., p. 74). During the next three years a very dynamic and fluid handling emerged, revealing the impact of Bradley Walker Tomlin, Gorky and especially the black-and-white abstractions of de Kooning. From these artists Kline evidently saw that his oil medium was capable of a calligraphic freedom and that the vestiges of figures and objects could become those rapid marks, halfway between ciphers and pure brushstrokes, that collide together in the shallow space of Untitled (c. 1948; Washington, DC, Hirshhorn). Studies in ink on paper simultaneously reinforced Kline’s sense of black and white as terse equivalents and allowed him to develop small emblematic compositions, usually based on a flurry of interlocking curves and gridlike vectors. When de Kooning enlarged some of these drawings c. 1948 as part of his own work using a Bell-Opticon projector, it affirmed Kline’s growing awareness that the sketch could be expanded to dramatic effect. In this process the rawness, spontaneity and crude design associated with a small-scale sketch assumed a monumental frisson once the dimensions of Cardinal (1.97×1.44 m, 1950; New York, priv. col., see Sandler, 1970, p. 253) were reached. This and comparable canvases comprised a one-man show at the Charles Egan Gallery in New York in October and November 1950, which established the artist as an innovator, partly on account of the sheer austerity of a style that did not change significantly again until the end of the decade.

The works in the Egan show of 1950 therefore demonstrated an idiom which could be continually explored and regenerated. In Cardinal and its successors great bands and wedges of black paint form a rough grid, sometimes varied by the inclusion of loops or arcs, which appear to defy the actual canvas limits, thrusting inexorably beyond its confines. Kline characterized this provocative instability as ‘the awkwardness of “not-balance”, the tentative reality of lack of balance …’, although in fact such images were composed with some care; the many sketches done on telephone directory pages chart a search for configurations that unite the impromptu and the monolithic. The exceptional economy of certain compositions, such as the rectangular motif in Wotan (1950–51; Houston, TX, Mus. F.A.), prompted frequent speculation about the influence of oriental calligraphy, yet Kline denied such links. Instead he acknowledged that his vocabulary was sufficiently elemental to evoke the known or the recognizable while avoiding any literal references: ‘There are forms that are figurative to me…. I don’t have the feeling that something has to be completely non-associative as far as figure form is concerned.’ The allusions can perhaps be read as harsh rectilinear silhouettes of New York itself, as well as the mechanical presences of the artist’s youth in Pennsylvania. Moreover, even the handling of black and white can be interpreted as emotive, since the enamel paints create textural conflicts that reiterate the struggle of forces on the picture’s surface. Kline fostered intense tonal contrasts, often working at night under strong light, and his use of housepainter’s brushes strengthened this aura of immediacy; tiny splatters or inflections accompanying the black wedges enhanced their explosive velocity. In the later 1950s such paintings as Requiem (1958; Buffalo, NY, Albright–Knox A.G.) added a third type of work to his repertory, by allowing the previously clearcut monochrome divisions to merge into a more complex chiaroscuro, the emotional tone of which Kline may have had in mind when he mentioned in an interview in 1960 the ‘brooding quality’ of certain ‘impending forms’.

In common with several other Abstract Expressionists, such as de Kooning and Rothko, Kline sought in the later 1950s to maintain a stylistic development. One result was a sequence of exceptionally large works, executed from 1959 to 1961 and known as the ‘wall paintings’, that echo the monumentality of later paintings by Clyfford Still or Robert Motherwell, with their almost panoramic horizontal sweep. Another decision, to introduce a full range of colour, proved more significant. Some black-and-white paintings had already retained traces of sombre hues, but now Kline returned to the strident palette that he had largely eschewed since the later 1940s, as in the clashing green, red, and purples of King Oliver (1958; New York, Mr and Mrs Donald Grossman priv. col., see Sandler, 1970, p. 254). At best, these accents amplify a frenetic verve in this final period. However, the colour planes occasionally seem rather superfluous, and at the time of his death the direction of Kline’s art was unresolved. Nonetheless, his influence on the second generation of gestural painters was substantial, and his works comprise some of the most imposing achievements of Abstract Expressionism.

My comments:

Since Kline is so well-known for his black and white paintings, and since he made so many of those, it came as a surprise to me to see a Kline painting with color. But the color that Kline has added to this painting adds a very interesting dynamic to it. Indeed, the painting does seem to possess more action, more velocity, more energy. I wonder how Kline decided which colors to add and how he would apply them to the canvas. Was it completely random, or did he plan it from the beginning? Based on how gestural the brushstrokes are, it makes me think that they would have to be somewhat random, but perhaps it was all planned. I’m not really sure in general how action painters like Kline, de Kooning, and Pollock painted, whether it was with chance or with deliberateness. Either way, it’s clear that all of these artists are incredibly talented. I personally like Kline’s work the most out of those three artists. They are not the only action painters out there, but they are three of the major ones so that is why I mention them. Anyway, it’s also interesting that the title of this painting only includes two colors when there are many more used. If someone just heard the title of this painting without seeing the painting itself, he or she would probably expect to see something much more dichromatic than the actual painting. I also wonder how Kline starts these paintings, and which color he lays down first. It’s a bit difficult to tell just by looking at the painting. Anyway, the relationships between the colors is what really makes this painting dynamic and interesting. Even though it looks like a technically easy painting to make, it would in fact be very difficult to create a painting that actually has color relationships that are in sync and in harmony.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: